Network Topologies
- Network Topologies
This article provides a technical overview of common network topologies used in server environments, particularly relevant for those managing a MediaWiki installation. Understanding these topologies is crucial for planning network infrastructure, troubleshooting connectivity issues, and ensuring optimal server performance. This guide assumes a basic familiarity with networking concepts such as IP addresses, Subnet masks, and DNS servers.
Introduction
A network topology refers to the physical or logical arrangement of nodes (servers, workstations, network devices) and connections in a network. The choice of topology significantly impacts network performance, scalability, cost, and resilience. Different topologies excel in different scenarios. We will explore several common topologies, their advantages, disadvantages, and typical use cases within a server environment. We will also discuss how these choices impact server administration and database performance.
Bus Topology
The bus topology is one of the simplest topologies. All devices are connected to a single cable, known as the bus or backbone. Communication occurs by broadcasting signals along the bus.
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Complexity | Low |
| Cost | Low |
| Scalability | Limited |
| Fault Tolerance | Low - a break in the bus disrupts the entire network |
| Performance | Degrades with increased traffic |
While historically used, bus topologies are rarely employed in modern server environments due to their limitations in scalability, fault tolerance, and performance. They are susceptible to collision issues and are difficult to troubleshoot. However, understanding the concept helps in grasping more complex topologies. Consider network security when evaluating any topology.
Star Topology
In a star topology, all devices are connected to a central hub or switch. All communication passes through this central point. This is the most common topology used in modern networks, including those supporting MediaWiki server farms.
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Complexity | Moderate |
| Cost | Moderate |
| Scalability | High |
| Fault Tolerance | Moderate - failure of a single device doesn’t affect the rest of the network, but failure of the central hub/switch does. |
| Performance | Generally good, especially with a switch. |
The advantage of a star topology lies in its ease of management, scalability, and fault isolation. Switches, unlike hubs, intelligently forward traffic only to the intended recipient, improving performance. Consider using a managed switch for advanced features like VLANs and Quality of Service (QoS).
Ring Topology
In a ring topology, each device is connected to exactly two other devices, forming a circular path for data transmission. Data travels in one direction around the ring until it reaches its destination.
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Complexity | Moderate |
| Cost | Moderate |
| Scalability | Limited |
| Fault Tolerance | Low - a break in the ring disrupts the entire network (unless using dual-ring topologies). |
| Performance | Can be good with low traffic, but degrades quickly with increased load. |
Ring topologies are less common in modern server environments. While offering some redundancy with dual-ring implementations, they generally lack the scalability and flexibility of star topologies. They can be useful in specific, isolated environments where deterministic data delivery is crucial. Consider the impact on server backup strategies.
Mesh Topology
A mesh topology provides redundancy by interconnecting all devices with multiple paths. This can be a full mesh (every device connected to every other device) or a partial mesh (some devices are connected to multiple others).
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Complexity | High |
| Cost | High |
| Scalability | Very High |
| Fault Tolerance | Very High - multiple paths ensure continued connectivity even if some links fail. |
| Performance | Excellent, due to redundant paths. |
Mesh topologies are often used in critical server environments where high availability is paramount. The redundancy makes them resilient to failures, but the cost and complexity of implementation are significant. This is often utilized in high availability clusters. Partial mesh topologies offer a balance between cost and redundancy. Review your disaster recovery plan in relation to network topology.
Hybrid Topologies
In practice, most networks employ a hybrid topology, combining elements of different topologies to meet specific needs. For example, a network might use a star topology within individual departments, connected to a backbone using a mesh or ring topology. This allows for optimization of performance, cost, and scalability. Consider the implications on load balancing.
Considerations for MediaWiki
When designing a network topology for a MediaWiki installation, consider the following:
- **Scalability:** Ensure the topology can accommodate future growth in users and content.
- **Redundancy:** Implement redundancy to minimize downtime in case of hardware failures.
- **Bandwidth:** Provide sufficient bandwidth to handle the expected traffic load.
- **Security:** Implement appropriate security measures to protect against unauthorized access. Review MediaWiki security extensions.
- **Latency:** Minimize latency to ensure a responsive user experience. Optimize your MediaWiki configuration for network performance.
Special:Search/network topology Special:Search/server infrastructure Special:Search/network security Special:Search/MediaWiki performance Special:Search/database configuration Special:Search/IP address Special:Search/DNS server Special:Search/subnet mask Special:Search/VLAN Special:Search/Quality of Service Special:Search/managed switch Special:Search/server administration Special:Search/load balancing Special:Search/high availability clusters Special:Search/disaster recovery plan Special:Search/MediaWiki security extensions Special:Search/MediaWiki configuration
Intel-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Core i7-6700K/7700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 512 GB | CPU Benchmark: 8046 |
| Core i7-8700 Server | 64 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2x1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 13124 |
| Core i9-9900K Server | 128 GB DDR4, NVMe SSD 2 x 1 TB | CPU Benchmark: 49969 |
| Core i9-13900 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i9-13900 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (64GB) | 64 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Server (128GB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x500 GB NVMe SSD | |
| Core i5-13500 Workstation | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2 NVMe SSD, NVIDIA RTX 4000 |
AMD-Based Server Configurations
| Configuration | Specifications | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 3600 Server | 64 GB RAM, 2x480 GB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 17849 |
| Ryzen 7 7700 Server | 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2x1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 35224 |
| Ryzen 9 5950X Server | 128 GB RAM, 2x4 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 46045 |
| Ryzen 9 7950X Server | 128 GB DDR5 ECC, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 63561 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/1TB) | 128 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/2TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (128GB/4TB) | 128 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/1TB) | 256 GB RAM, 1 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 7502P Server (256GB/4TB) | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe | CPU Benchmark: 48021 |
| EPYC 9454P Server | 256 GB RAM, 2x2 TB NVMe |
Order Your Dedicated Server
Configure and order your ideal server configuration
Need Assistance?
- Telegram: @powervps Servers at a discounted price
⚠️ *Note: All benchmark scores are approximate and may vary based on configuration. Server availability subject to stock.* ⚠️